A screenshot of the livestream

On March the 15th in Christchurch New Zealand a madman with terror on his mind gunned down worshippers in 2 mosques with what was cold and calculated intent. His targets were unarmed and stood no chance of escape or indeed the means to fight back, for the first time in the age of social media the attack was live streamed to the world and his full manifesto was there for all to see, his reasoning, his plans, his aims all in black and white – no need for assumption or for the press to spoon feed you the narrative, no the brutality was laid bare for all to digest in sickening real time.

Within hours the New Zealand government had stated that firearms laws were going to change, links to the live stream were scrubbed from the internet along with the manifesto and citizens faced prison for even sharing them in apparent bad taste, the media scrambled to blame the firearms used and just as the attacker predicted and indeed wanted – he said so himself in his manifesto (see below) – he purposely used firearms for the impact they would have in the press and to initiate worldwide bans as this is the modus operandi of western governments regardless of the fact terror is achieved in many ways these days, be it a truck, a bomb, acid, knives etc.

No, it is the firearms themselves that needed to be taken and so it was announced of an impending ban by the Prime Minister (Ardern) of certain firearms being outlawed and yet again the law abiding owners were being tarred by the actions of a lunatic with evil intent.

The bodies were barely cold when he got exactly what he wanted.

Within hours of the attack in the United States Democrats were chomping at the bit to blame the NRA and so the attacker got exactly as he wanted.

Again he made it very clear in his own words yet he played them like an old fiddle with a familiar tune.

And so too in my own country the United Kingdom the press have set their sights on the most vetted members of society here, the people that have to jump through more hoops than most, that allow police to comb through every aspect of their lives and medical history and are held to extremely high standards……….The Firearm license holder and shooter.

Published in the early hours of the morning (Sat 23rd March 2019) the Times decided that vilifying the law abiding sports shooter is the ideal way to generate mass panic and receive website hits, and with their own cold intent have focused on the exciting and highly popular sport of practical shooting.

Practical shooting is a catchall term for a sport wherein you run a course and shoot at specified targets in the quickest time with the most accuracy possible. It’s popular as the more traditional form of target wherein you shoot at a stationary paper target while staying in the same position can lose its appeal after a while. Practical has attracted new shooters to the sport and has breathed new life into a waning industry that was once dominated by men with shotguns and tweed, they don’t wear camo, they aren’t “training” in military techniques, they are simply shooting and keeping fit at the same time. Safety is always paramount.

In action on a practical course

The firearms themselves are a reflection of how far the equipment has evolved and with the implementation of adjustable stocks it’s made shooting accessible to people with disabilities like myself that need to be able to adjust their shooting position in relation to mobility restrictions and pain levels on the day. The evolution of the firearms is akin to anything else out there, I’m not writing this article with papyrus and a quill after all.

The writers are hoping that the appearance of the firearms will be enough to instill outrage and push further legislation here in the UK when crime associated with them is virtually non existent, the truth however won’t get as many clicks in an age when this matters more than actual journalism.

Below is a picture of myself holding a 22LR (very small Rimfire round) with an adjustable stock and the features really have given me the ability to compete on the same level as someone able bodied for the more traditional target shooting.

Mike Lindsay with a 10/22

Every piece of the firearm has been catered to my needs, the floating barrel gives a tiny amount more accuracy where points matter in fractions of an inch on paper, the bipod steadies the aim again to help where millimetres count, the magazine capacity means less loading, the moderator ensures hearing is protected. When removed from the stock it looks like any other rifle, it is exactly the same firearm just in a wooden stock.

It is locked away when not being used for sport, the police know of it’s whereabouts, the owner has been vetted to a high degree, there are ammunition limits in place. It is by no means an “assault rifle” which is a term by definition that means a military full auto.

It is regarded worldwide as a plinker more than anything else, if it was in a black stock it wouldn’t make this any less true. (And yes I wear camo to hunt as it blends you into the bushes and makes it possible to fill your freezer, the same reason people originally started wearing tweed.)

Our own supposed “advocates” were quoted in the hit pieces willing it seems to throw out logic and reason along with any unity they had to the sport. Mr Michael “Mike” Yardley a long time “expert” and “shooting advocate” was quoted in the article as saying,

“There is no real place in sports shooting for assault-style weapons nor is pretending to be in the SAS justifiable as a sport” -Mike Yardley

Mike Yardley partaking in pistol shooting

Three things immediately stand out to me in Mr Yardley’s quote, the term “assault-style weapon” is an inacuracy as a semi auto or indeed straight pull varient firearm is incapable of being an assault anything. If he is referring to them having a modern appearance then I would surmise that he may be a little out of touch when it comes to modern sporting equipment or indeed terminology of firearms. Perhaps a range day is in order to get up to speed in a safe and controlled environment.

A firearm is only a weapon when used as such for example to harm someone else, the same way a hammer is just a tool when used to build – use it to harm another however and it does indeed become a weapon.

Sportsmen and women engaging in practical shooting I assure you are not trying to be the SAS, that is a ridiculous assertion and one worthy of considerable scorn from the shooting community. Any event I have witnessed has been professionally run, safe, regulated and has people partaking to compete in a modern and exciting discipline and nothing more.

In closing the firearm is not to blame for Christchurch, the other legal shooters are not to blame for Christchurch, the practical shooting community are not to blame for Christchurch, the NRA are not to blame, nor mag capacity, nor polymer stocks, nor hunters, target shooters, pest controllers, clay shooters. The madman pulling the trigger is to blame and he made it clear he could have used many other methods.

We didn’t ban the lorry after the Nice attacks, we didn’t ban concerts after the Bataclan attack or indeed the Manchester bomb, we didn’t ban planes after September 11th 2001. We mourned, we lit candles and changed profile pictures but we picked ourselves up, dusted ourselves off and said no to being afraid. We need to do the same here and stop targeting the wrong people, stop targeting the tool used for the crime but rather address who used it and why. Stop giving him what he set out to do.

Truck attack in Nice

Legislation against the object may feel like doing something to most but the reality is very different, a terrorist will use any means to incite fear and to kill, you cannot unfortunately legislate your way to safety however what our governments can do is address the societal issues.

Any ban on firearms now after the attack is merely a virtue signal disguised as positive action, the sport shooter isn’t to blame and it’s unjust to try to pin it on them. Punish the attacker yes, mourn the victims but leave good people alone.

-Mike

Advertisements

9 thoughts on “SHOOTING SPORTS IN THE FIRING LINE

  1. As a shooter and gun owner,I applaud your efforts on behald of our community,and congratulate you a very well written and presented article .I only wish I had even a tiny piece of your ability to write in such a manner.Thank you,it was an excellent read.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. I am appalled at the atrocity but equally appalled at Mike Yardley statement!!! After losing our full bore semi autos after Hungerford and after losing our hand guns after Dunblane. Two atrocities allowed to happen because police officers didn’t do their jobs correctly, result g in law abiding citezens being villified, ridiculed and punished because of the actions of two lunatics.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Fantastic and well thought out article as always. Can never understand why they have to focus on an inanimate object and not the perpetrator. If any other means of attack had been used as he said in his manifesto the media coverage and slant put on the attack would have been hugely different. Thanks for all your hard work and clear voice as always 👍🏼

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Methinks Mr Yardley is projecting, somewhat! “Assault weapons,” and “SAS” games – perhaps he’s still a little sore about his stunted little military career ;^)

    Liked by 1 person

  5. You might like to add that Mike Yardley cannot shoot that pistol in the UK – where was that taken – elsewhere in Europe?

    Also, I have taken a positive stand against the restrictions on lawful rifle ownership planned in the Offensive weapons Bill now completing its passage through Parliament. See ​my crowdfunding page which gives more info, at:
    ​​https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/martin-osment

    And support us, or risk yet more restrictions. Direct bank account details are available on request, and those funds are not shown on the crowdfunding page. We have identified specialist Solicitors and Counsel to act for us, and the briefs are in preparation.
    ” Please also see my video: http://www.gunroom.tv/2019/01/04/why-the-mars-vz58-is-so-important/

    Like

  6. Great piece. BBC breakfast discussed the mail article @ 0830. Full of shock horror. They called it great journalism? Lazy journalism more like. But thankfully it was dropped @ 0930hrs. Apparently owning a multi shot semi isn’t a sport? Perhaps someone from the PSG world could invite their sports presenter to try it 😉.

    Like

  7. A very well written piece, Mike. The Times “piece” last week on PSG was one of the most sensationalist pieces of “journalism” trash i think i have ever seen. No proper coverage of RFD transfers to fully explain how purchasing works, making out there are no controls to the layman reader. Shame on the BBC allowing Phil Hall to put his views out like he did on Saturday morning at 08:30 on the back of it, too. All this no more than a week after the tragedy in NZ. The media are NOT helping when it comes to mass shootings, slavvering all over these tragic events in the way they do, they are fuelling the problem and giving the perpertrators the oxygen of fame they seek.

    Like

  8. The UKPSA as a governing body were named in the article, but naturally they omitted some vital information.
    At any UKPSA sanctioned match you have to have a competition licence for the discipline your taking part in.

    It’s all about responsibility and Safety.
    Our safety record is very good.

    We also came back as a team with 18 medals at the Shotgun World Championships 2018 held in France.

    Interesting that I had a call from an RFD who had s phone call from a customer wanting to know when his shotgun would be delivered!
    Are you collecting it from me?
    No want it delivered to my house!
    Which local RFD do you want to use?
    What is an RFD?
    Do you have an FAC? and authority to purchase one?
    What’s an FAC?
    Thankyou sir I will cancel the order and refund your money!
    How many others will now try this??

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s